Information Related to "An Overview of Conditions Around the World - May/Jun 2002"
Beyond Today subscriptionAudio/Video
view Beyond Today

World News and Trends
An OverView of Conditions Around the World


John Ross Schroeder, Melvin Rhodes and Scott Ashley

Why is Middle East peace so elusive?

As pressure mounts for a peaceful resolution to the conflict between Israelis and Palestinians, it is important to understand why no easy solutions are in sight.

Much of the world press tends to blame the problems on Israeli intransigence. In the news media's view, Israel, backed by the United States, has the weaponry while the Palestinians are a suffering people that simply wants to return to its ancestral homeland. Yet it's not so simple.

A recent article by American columnist Michael Barone sums up the situation:
". . . Israel is ready to accept a Palestinian state. The problem is that the Palestinians refuse to accept the Israeli state."

Former Israeli prime minister Benyamin Netanyahu has repeatedly made the same points in interviews on American and British television programs. The former head of the Jewish state has explained the difference between the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), led by Yasir Arafat, and Hamas, the Palestinian terrorist organization that is generally considered more extreme than the PLO.

Mr. Netanyahu states that Hamas is consistent in calling for the destruction of the Jewish state: It says the same in Arabic to Palestinians as it says in English to the rest of the world. In contrast, Mr. Netanyahu notes, Mr. Arafat says one thing in Arabic and another in English. While appearing to show a willingness to compromise when speaking to the rest of the world, he sends a completely different message when speaking in Arabic to Arabs.

In recent months, for example, he has repeatedly called for "martyrs" (suicide bombers) to march on and liberate Jerusalem. As Israeli troops surrounded his compound in the West Bank city of Ramallah, in a series of interviews on March 29 he told Arab television reporters:

"Let those far and near understand: None, among the Palestinian people or the Arab nation, will be willing to bow and surrender. But we ask Allah to grant us martyrdom, to grant us martyrdom. To Jerusalem we march--martyrs by the millions . . ."

"We are seekers of martyrdom. We are all seekers of martyrdom. The entire Palestinian people is a seeker of martyrdom . . ."

"I may be martyred, but certainly one of our boys or one of our girls will wave the flag of Palestine over the walls of Jerusalem, over the minarets of Jerusalem, and over the churches of Jerusalem."

The destruction of Israel appears to remain the ultimate Palestinian goal. Schoolchildren in Palestinian Authority-controlled areas learn from textbooks that show "Palestine" where Israel now exists, with "Israel" nonexistent on the maps.

For many Palestinians the return of refugees goes hand in hand with the elimination of the Jewish state. If enough refugees returned to Israel, the Jewish population would be swamped. Israel's democratic system would result in a Palestinian majority that would put an end to the 53-year-old Jewish nation. Even if the numbers returning were smaller, a higher birth rate could eventually have the same result. In the interim, more Palestinians living in Israel would probably mean more violence.

Pressure from the liberal Western democracies and the world's press may endanger Israel's very existence. As Israelis themselves are quick to point out, they have fought four wars for their survival since the nation's founding in 1948. They cannot afford to lose a single one, for if they do their nation ceases to exist.

Israelis remain reluctant to surrender the West Bank for a proposed Palestinian state for two major reasons. First, many Israelis consider it part of the land God promised them in perpetuity through Abraham. Indeed, some of the very places in which the Bible records God making these promises (Genesis 12:6-7; 13:3,14-18) are today in the Palestinian-controlled West Bank.

Second, a return to pre-1967 borders would leave Israel barely a dozen miles wide along much of its length and thus vulnerable to a potentially fatal military assault from hostile neighbors.

As long as Israel's existence is threatened and the Palestinians' hopes are thwarted, any peace agreement is not likely to last. Bible prophecies such as Luke 21:20 and Zechariah 14:1-4 show that Jerusalem and its environs will lie at the center of global strife immediately before Christ's return. Keep your eyes on Jerusalem. The "City of Peace" will continue to be a focus of world news. (Sources: U.S. News & World Report, BBC, Middle East Media Research Institute Web site.)

(back to top)
The world: more dangerous than ever

More than half a year has passed since the cataclysmic events of Sept. 11–a day that lives in infamy. Yet, in spite of American and British efforts to corral terrorism, the world appears as dangerous as ever.

The Middle East is again squarely in the forefront of world attention. In the words of British Prime Minister Tony Blair, "the situation in the Middle East is a tragedy turning into a catastrophe." Yet another Mideast war could break out at any time. Recent events in Israel and the West Bank have even overshadowed
a possible U.S.-led attack on Iraq to overthrow the Saddam Hussein regime. In the words of a British journalist, Iraq is "the poisonous centre of a spider’s web" of nations that support terrorism and are actively pursuing weapons of mass destruction–nuclear, chemical and/or biological.

But the Middle East is far from the only pressure point in the world. According to CIA director George Tenet, war between India and Pakistan, perhaps primarily over Kashmir, is a real possibility. He warned that the continuing conflict could erupt into a catastrophic war between the two nuclear-armed adversaries.

A long mop-up operation drags on in Afghanistan. Parts of Africa, and to a lesser extent Asia, spin in a continual merry-goround of wars and lesser conflicts. As British author William Rees-Mogg wrote in his weekly column for The Times: "War is always unpredictable. It can spring up again at a distance from the original source. No one foresaw . . . that a strike against New York would lead to a war crisis over Kashmir."

If you would like to understand where this war-weary world is headed, you need to write for our free booklets - Are We Living in the Time of the End?, You Can Understand Bible Prophecy and The Book of Revelation Unveiled. (Sources: The Financial Times, The Times, Daily Mail (all London), USA Today, Agence France-Presse.)

(back to top)

The President sets America a good example

George Bush has tried to restore spiritual leadership to the American presidency. One speech this year at the National Prayer Breakfast in Washington illustrates his efforts. It included a significant observation about prayer: "Millions of Americans have been led to prayer. They have prayed for comfort in time of grief, for understanding in a time of anger, for protection in a time of uncertainty. Many, including me, have been on bended knee."

But the president recognizes that, besides prayer, a code of moral conduct is also necessary. From Daytona Beach, Florida, he told the nation that "each of us (is) responsible for the decisions we make in life," condemning the feel-good culture that many citizens have bought into.

Like his father, who wanted a kinder, gentler America, Mr. Bush would like to see some changes in the American way of life, altering the country’s soft moral culture. He even partially blamed the amoral style of American soap operas shown abroad on TV for misleading foreign terrorists into believing that the United States would not react to a major terrorist attack in New York City and Washington. (Sources: The Washington Times, Reuters.)

(back to top)

Germany wants a European army

The German ambassador to Washington has called for a European army "as a logical step toward integration after the successful launch of a new single currency (the euro)." "Does it make sense to keep national armies? Does it make sense to keep 15 navies?," asked Wolfgang Ischinger in an address before diplomats and scholars at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars in Washington.

He is not the only voice calling for a European army. EU Commission president Romano Prodi has stated that "British or French or German soldiers (will) fight under an EU flag and take orders from a European commander."

The concept of a European army reportedly came from Napoleon, who is said to have observed that with French officers and British troops he could conquer the world. In stark opposition to an EU superstate, former British prime minister Margaret Thatcher has repeatedly warned America and Britain of the dangers of mustering a European army. She recently wrote: "The real drive toward a separate European defence is the same as that toward a single European currency–namely
the utopian venture of creating a single European super-state to rival the U.S. on the world stage."

Many voices in Europe and Britain are raised against the philosophy of Baroness Thatcher. But, like Sir Winston Churchill before her, she understands the history of the Continent and where its political machinations have led it so many times. (Sources: United Press International, World News Bulletin (Internet), Statecraft.)

(back to top)

TV viewing and violence

Watching as little as one hour of television a day can lead teenagers and young adults to engage in violence such as fistfights and other assaults later in life, according to researchers who conducted a study that tracked more than 700 young people over 17 years. Researchers also concluded that the more television participants viewed, the more likely they were to engage in violent behavior.

The study began in 1983 when researchers interviewed 707 teenagers, average age 14, about their viewing habits. They followed up eight years later, correlating the amount of television viewing with law-enforcement records and information gleaned through interviews with the participants. Of those who watched TV less than an hour a day, fewer than 6 percent had acted violently in a way that resulted in a serious injury. However, the rate of violence tripled, to 18.4 percent, among those
who watched one to three hours of TV daily. Among those who watched more than three hours of TV, the rate of violence more than quadrupled to 25.3 percent.

Researchers also studied the group after another eight years had passed and most were well into adulthood. Again the differences were startling. Of those who watched less than an hour of TV daily as adults, only 1.2 percent had committed a violent act–compared to 10.8 percent of those who averaged three or more hours a day. This almost fivefold increase led researchers to conclude that adult behavior, too, is shaped by TV viewing.

The impact of media exposure on our thinking, values and behavior is the subject of several articles in this issue. We urge you to read all of them as well as the sources mentioned in the recommended-reading boxes at the end of each article. This study is further proof that what you allow into your mind has major consequences in your life. (Source: The Washington Post.)

(back to top)



© 2002-2022 United Church of God, an International Association

Related Information:

Table of Contents that includes "An Overview of Conditions Around the World - May/Jun 2002"
Origin of article "An Overview of Conditions Around the World - May/Jun 2002"
Keywords: Israeli Palestinian conflict September 11 European army television, influence of television and violence 

September 11:

Television, influence of: European Union - military: Israel, modern: Key Subjects Index
General Topics Index
Biblical References Index
Home Page of this site