Information Related to "VCM Letters to the Editor: September/October 2004"

Audio/Video

				Letters to the Editor "Why No Spectacular Miracles Today?" I disagree with the author of this manuscript because it describes God as a failure in all the miracles He performed. There is one thing that God cannot do. I believe God will never fail. The article "Why No Spectacular Miracles Today?" by David J. Sandland was in no way dismissing the miracles God performed as failures. What Mr. Sandland was trying to convey was that in early Bible times it was necessary to have great miracles so that God would be known and seen as God by the people. But the greatest miracle, Mr. Sandland pointed out, is the miracle of conversion. As the article states, "The miracles we read about in the Bible were examples of the power and love of God that are important to our understanding. But now that we have the biblical record, there is not the need to continually repeat all the different types of miracles." The reference to miracles not being good for us is not a statement of any failure on God's part, but of man's failures. It is always man's own carnal mind that creates failure, not God. Mr. Sandland was speaking of man's ego and the tendency to take credit away from God and the misuse that could occur through the use of such miracles. Some feedback messages are edited for space and/or clarity Copyright 2004 by United Church of God, an International Association All rights reserved.

Related Information:

Origin of article "VCM Letters to the Editor: September/October 2004"
Keywords: letters from VCM readers 

Letters from VCM readers:

• VCM Letters to the Editor: February 1999
• VCM Letters to the Editor: March 1999
• VCM Letters to the Editor: April 1999
• VCM Letters to the Editor: May 1999
• VCM Letters to the Editor: June 1999
• VCM Letters to the Editor: July 1999
• VCM Letters to the Editor: August 1999
• VCM Letters to the Editor: September/October 1999
• VCM Letters to the Editor: November 1999
• VCM Letters to the Editor: December 1999
• VCM Letters to the Editor: March 2000
• VCM Letters to the Editor: July 2000
• VCM Letters to the Editor: November 2000
• VCM Letters to the Editor: August 2001
• VCM Letters to the Editor: September/October 2001
• VCM Letters to the Editor: January 2003
• VCM Letters to the Editor: February 2003
• VCM Letters to the Editor: March/April 2003
• VCM Letters to the Editor: May 2003
• VCM Letters to the Editor: July 2003
• VCM Letters to the Editor: August 2003
• VCM Letters to the Editor: October/November 2003
• VCM Letters to the Editor: December 2003
• VCM Letters to the Editor: March 2004
• VCM Letters to the Editor: June 2004
• VCM Letters to the Editor: July 2004
• VCM Letters to the Editor: August 2004
• VCM Letters to the Editor: November 2004
• VCM Letters to the Editor: December 2004
• VCM Letters to the Editor: January 2005
• VCM Letters to the Editor: February 2005
• VCM Letters to the Editor: April/May 2005
• VCM Letters to the Editor: June 2005
• VCM Letters to the Editor: July 2005
• VCM Letters to the Editor: August 2005
• VCM Letters to the Editor: November 2005
• VCM Letters to the Editor: December 2005
• VCM Letters to the Editor: January 2006
• VCM Letters to the Editor: February 2006
• VCM Letters to the Editor: March 2006
• VCM Letters to the Editor: July 2006
• VCM Letters to the Editor: August 2006
• VCM Letters to the Editor: October/November 2006
• VCM Letters to the Editor: January 2007
• VCM Letters to the Editor: February 2007
• VCM Letters to the Editor: May 2007
• VCM Letters to the Editor: June 2007
• VCM Letters to the Editor: July 2007
• VCM Letters to the Editor: August 2007
• VCM Letters to the Editor: September/October 2007
• VCM Letters to the Editor: November 2007
• VCM Letters to the Editor: December 2007
• VCM Letters to the Editor: January 2008
• VCM Letters to the Editor: February 2008
• VCM Letters to the Editor: March 2008
• VCM Letters to the Editor: April/May 2008
• VCM Letters to the Editor: June 2008
• VCM Letters to the Editor: December 2008
• VCM Letters to the Editor: January 2009
• VCM Letters to the Editor: February 2009
• VCM Letters to the Editor: March 2009
• VCM Letters to the Editor: June 2009
• VCM Letters to the Editor: July 2009
• VCM Letters to the Editor: September 2009
• VCM Letters to the Editor: October/November 2009
• VCM Letters to the Editor: February 2010
• VCM Letters to the Editor: August 2010
• VCM Letters to the Editor: December 2010
• VCM Letters to the Editor: January 2011